<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smooth Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewdawkins.co.uk/2007/09/smooth-safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewdawkins.co.uk/2007/09/smooth-safari/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=smooth-safari</link>
	<description>Thanks for dropping by. Make yourself at home. Below is my blog. The links at the top will take you elsewhere. Enjoy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillsacre.me.uk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On Safari&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewdawkins.co.uk/2007/09/smooth-safari/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>phillsacre.me.uk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On Safari&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=377#comment-484</guid>
		<description>[...] as Matthew wrote a few thoughts on it a couple of days ago, I decided to try it myself, so I&#8217;ve just downloaded and installed [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Matthew wrote a few thoughts on it a couple of days ago, I decided to try it myself, so I&#8217;ve just downloaded and installed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewdawkins.co.uk/2007/09/smooth-safari/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=377#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Ack, I&#039;m obviously tired, I made so many mistakes in that comment! I should probably mention that I meant to finish with the word &quot;otherwise&quot;, so please mentally append it to the end of that comment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack, I&#8217;m obviously tired, I made so many mistakes in that comment! I should probably mention that I meant to finish with the word &#8220;otherwise&#8221;, so please mentally append it to the end of that comment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewdawkins.co.uk/2007/09/smooth-safari/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=377#comment-482</guid>
		<description>According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/11.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his blog post&lt;/a&gt;, Safari on Windows does run slow the first few times you load it. As for the font rendering - Apple did basically take the Mac font rendering and port it across to the Windows version. I&#039;m not convinced this is a good thing - there was a whole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000885.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discussion&lt;/a&gt; about it on Jeff Atwood&#039;s blog a while back. I guess it&#039;s what you&#039;re used to, how you&#039;re machine&#039;s set up etc.

I guess Safari&#039;s not a bad choice if you&#039;re a Mac user forced to use Windows, or you&#039;re testing for compatibility, but I reckon Opera or Firefox would be a better choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://joelonsoftware.com/items/2007/06/11.html" rel="nofollow">his blog post</a>, Safari on Windows does run slow the first few times you load it. As for the font rendering &#8211; Apple did basically take the Mac font rendering and port it across to the Windows version. I&#8217;m not convinced this is a good thing &#8211; there was a whole <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000885.html" rel="nofollow">discussion</a> about it on Jeff Atwood&#8217;s blog a while back. I guess it&#8217;s what you&#8217;re used to, how you&#8217;re machine&#8217;s set up etc.</p>
<p>I guess Safari&#8217;s not a bad choice if you&#8217;re a Mac user forced to use Windows, or you&#8217;re testing for compatibility, but I reckon Opera or Firefox would be a better choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

